PerroNo es un uso apropiado

Dermatitis atópica canina y enfermedad alérgica de la piel

Canine atopic dermatitis (cAD), Atopy (the inherited predisposition, not the skin disease itself), Allergic skin disease, Environmental allergy in dogs, Allergic dermatitis

La dermatitis atópica es una alergia de por vida que se manifiesta en la piel del perro y no en la nariz. El sistema inmunitario reacciona de más ante cosas cotidianas como los ácaros del polvo, el polen o el moho, y el resultado es picazón (prurito), casi siempre en las patas, la barriga, las axilas, la ingle, la cara y las orejas. Es muy frecuente, no es culpa suya y no se contagia. No tiene cura. La mayoría de los perros mejora bastante cuando se encuentra el plan adecuado a largo plazo, pero encontrarlo suele tomar varios meses y algo de ensayo y error, y una minoría de perros sigue siendo difícil de controlar: evalúe el plan por temporadas, no por días. Conviene distinguir dos cosas: la «atopia» es la predisposición hereditaria a desarrollar alergias, mientras que la «dermatitis atópica» es la enfermedad de la piel; no son lo mismo. Y hay algo más que debe saber antes de empezar: la alergia alimentaria produce una picazón casi idéntica y es un diagnóstico distinto. Solo se puede identificar con una dieta de eliminación estricta —por lo general unas ocho semanas sin que absolutamente nada más pase por la boca del perro: ni premios, ni huesos o masticables, ni medicamentos con sabor—, así que si su veterinario/a le pide la dieta, no es una demora: es la prueba. Tres reglas de seguridad que importan más que cualquier otra cosa en esta página. Primera: nunca le dé a su perro medicamentos humanos para el dolor. El ibuprofeno, el naproxeno, la aspirina y el acetaminofén (paracetamol) pueden intoxicar a un perro, y el acetaminofén es mortal para los gatos. Segunda: nunca le dé a un animal el medicamento de otro animal, y sobre todo nunca le aplique a un gato un producto antipulgas para perros ni un antiinflamatorio para perros. Las pipetas de permetrina para perros matan gatos, incluso gatos que solo lamieron o se recostaron contra un perro tratado una hora antes. Tercera: cuando su perro esté tomando un medicamento que usted le da en casa, llame a la clínica antes de cambiar cualquier cosa. No suba, baje, espacie, suspenda, reinicie ni duplique una dosis por su cuenta, aunque la picazón parezca vencida, y aunque solo se trate de añadir una crema o un antihistamínico de uso humano.

Qué podría notar

  • Rascarse, lamerse, morderse o restregarse durante semanas, y cada vez más
  • Lamerse y morderse las patas, con el pelo manchado de un color óxido por la saliva
  • Piel roja y con picazón en las axilas, la ingle, la barriga y alrededor de los ojos, el hocico y las orejas
  • Problemas de oído que vuelven una y otra vez: sacude la cabeza, se rasca las orejas, las orejas huelen mal o tienen cera
  • Piel que se pone gruesa y oscura y pierde el pelo justo en las zonas donde más se rasca
  • Picazón que empezó antes de los tres años de edad, o que vuelve en la misma época cada año
  • Costras, granitos, o un olor grasoso y a humedad, que suele indicar una infección de la piel añadida
  • Un perro que no logra descansar de noche, o que interrumpe la comida y el juego para rascarse
  • Picazón que está presente todo el año, o picazón junto con heces blandas, vómito o gases: ese patrón hace sospechar alergia alimentaria, que se ve casi igual, es un diagnóstico distinto y solo se comprueba con una dieta de eliminación estricta

Estándar de atención

  1. Find and remove flare factors, and treat secondary infection, before escalating drugs

    Aprobado / respaldado por guías

    ICADA's first move for an acute flare is to search for and eliminate the cause of the flare, bathe with mild shampoos, and control pruritus and lesions with topical and/or oral glucocorticoids or oclacitinib. For chronic disease the first steps in management are identification and avoidance of flare factors plus adequate skin and coat hygiene. In practice that means year-round flea control, treating staphylococcal pyoderma, Malassezia dermatitis and otitis found on cytology, and not immunosuppressing an undiagnosed itch. THE FLEA-CONTROL STEP HAS A CROSS-SPECIES HAZARD ATTACHED. Concentrated permethrin and other pyrethroid dog spot-ons are severely and often fatally toxic to cats, including by secondary contact from a treated dog. In an Australian survey of 255 veterinary practices, 750 individual cases of permethrin spot-on intoxication in cats were reported over two years with 166 deaths, and the majority of cases involved products labelled for DOGS, applied to a cat accidentally or intentionally, or transferred by contact with a treated dog (Malik R et al., J Feline Med Surg 2010;12(1):5-14, PMID 20123482, DOI 10.1016/j.jfms.2009.12.002). In a multi-species household, the flea plan must be written for every animal in it.

    Productos nombrados: Topical antiseptics and mild shampoos; systemic or topical antimicrobials chosen on cytology and, where indicated, culture. Antimicrobial choice should be stewardship-aligned; no specific antibacterial is guideline-mandated for cAD, and repeated empirical long courses without cytology or culture select for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. SAFETY LIMITS: never apply a dog ectoparasiticide to a cat, and keep a cat away from a freshly treated dog until the application site is dry; read the species statement on every flea product every time. Medicated shampoos and antiseptics are for the coat, not the eyes or ear canals, and a dog that licks a treated coat gets an oral dose.

    ICADA 2015 consensus treatment guidelines (Olivry et al.), with the diagnostic work-up specified in the companion ICADA diagnostic guidelines (Hensel et al. 2015, PMID 26260508, DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0515-5). Consensus guideline, not an RCT. The pyrethroid-in-cats hazard is a practitioner survey with self-reported case counts (Malik 2010, PMID 20123482), so the counts are indicative rather than incidence, but the toxicity itself and the dog-product-on-a-cat route are not in question.

    Olivry T et al. BMC Vet Res 2015;11:210. PMID 26276051. DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0514-6; Malik R et al. J Feline Med Surg 2010;12(1):5-14. PMID 20123482. DOI 10.1016/j.jfms.2009.12.002

  2. Control the acute flare: topical or oral glucocorticoids, or oclacitinib

    Aprobado / respaldado por guías

    For an acute flare ICADA recommends controlling pruritus and lesions with topical and/or oral glucocorticoids or oclacitinib, alongside bathing. Oclacitinib is a Janus kinase inhibitor given orally and is FDA-approved for dogs (NADA 141-345). Expect rapid relief and use the flare course as the shortest effective course, not as the long-term plan. Owners must be told to call the clinic before changing an oclacitinib or steroid dose at home — the twice-daily induction period is deliberately short, and the common owner error is to keep the twice-daily rate going because it worked.

    Productos nombrados: Oclacitinib maleate (Apoquel, oral JAK inhibitor, FDA-approved for dogs, NADA 141-345 — verified on the DailyMed label). LABEL LIMITS, verbatim from that label: 'APOQUEL is not for use in dogs less than 12 months of age'; 'APOQUEL is not for use in dogs with serious infections'; 'APOQUEL may increase susceptibility to infection, including demodicosis, and exacerbation of neoplastic conditions'; 'New neoplastic conditions (benign and malignant) were observed in dogs treated with APOQUEL during clinical studies'; 'APOQUEL is not for use in breeding dogs, or pregnant or lactating bitches'; 'Dogs receiving APOQUEL should be monitored for the development of infections, including demodicosis, and neoplasia.' Human handling, verbatim: 'Wash hands immediately after handling the tablets… In case of accidental ingestion, seek medical attention immediately.' Oral glucocorticoids: prednisolone, methylprednisolone — expect increased thirst, urination and appetite, and panting; the risks that matter are iatrogenic hyperadrenocorticism, urinary tract infection and diabetes mellitus on prolonged use, so these are flare drugs on the shortest effective course. Topical glucocorticoids including hydrocortisone aceponate spray, and topical triamcinolone — use on defined areas for defined periods, not indefinitely over large areas. Topical tacrolimus is used OFF-LABEL in dogs: no veterinary label governs it, owners should wear gloves to apply it, the dog must be kept from licking the site, and the human topical tacrolimus product carries a boxed warning headed 'WARNING: Long-term Safety of Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors Has Not Been Established' which states that 'rare cases of malignancy (e.g., skin and lymphoma) have been reported in patients treated with topical calcineurin inhibitors, including tacrolimus ointment' (DailyMed, tacrolimus ointment). NEVER substitute a human oral or topical pain or anti-inflammatory product for any of these.

    ICADA 2015 guideline recommendation. Independently, a Cochrane-method systematic review of 49 randomised controlled trials enrolling 2,126 dogs found evidence of efficacy for oral glucocorticoids (5 RCTs), topical triamcinolone (1 RCT) and topical tacrolimus (3 RCTs) in reducing pruritus and/or lesions of canine AD (Olivry et al., Vet Dermatol 2010;21:4–22, PMID 20187910, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00784.x). Long-term oclacitinib data come from a 247-dog open-label compassionate-use study dosed up to 630 days: 63.9% of dogs had a ≥50% reduction in pruritus VAS and 66.4% in dermatitis VAS at day 90 — and the SAME abstract reports that 'Urinary tract infection/cystitis, vomiting, otitis, pyoderma and diarrhoea were the most frequently reported (>5% of dogs) abnormal clinical signs', with haematology and serum chemistry means remaining within reference ranges (Cosgrove et al., Vet Dermatol 2015;26:171–9, PMID 25688708, DOI 10.1111/vde.12194). The efficacy figures and the adverse-event list come from one manufacturer-sponsored, open-label source and must always travel together.

    Olivry T et al. BMC Vet Res 2015;11:210. PMID 26276051. DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0514-6; Cosgrove SB et al. Vet Dermatol 2015;26(3):171-9, e35. PMID 25688708. DOI 10.1111/vde.12194

  3. Establish long-term pruritus control with a guideline-listed agent

    Aprobado / respaldado por guías

    For chronic canine AD, ICADA states the medications currently most effective in reducing chronic pruritus and skin lesions are topical and oral glucocorticoids, oral ciclosporin, oral oclacitinib, and — where available — injectable recombinant interferons. Lokivetmab, a caninized anti-interleukin-31 monoclonal antibody given by subcutaneous injection, is the other mainstream long-term option and post-dates the 2015 guideline text. Lokivetmab relieves itch only: it has no antimicrobial activity and does not treat the secondary pyoderma, Malassezia dermatitis or otitis that often accompany a flare, so a dog that stops scratching on it can still have an untreated infection.

    Productos nombrados: Lokivetmab (Cytopoint) — a veterinary BIOLOGIC licensed by USDA APHIS Center for Veterinary Biologics in December 2016, NOT FDA-approved; EU marketing authorisation EMEA/V/C/003939, first authorised 5 May 2017 (verified on the EMA medicine page). LIMITS: it treats pruritus, not infection; anti-drug antibodies may develop; reported adverse effects include injection-site pain, lethargy, vomiting, diarrhoea, anorexia, hyperexcitability and urinary incontinence; like any injected protein it can in rare cases provoke an acute allergic reaction, so the emergency signs in the red-flag list apply for the hours after a dose. Ciclosporin (cyclosporine, modified, oral — Atopica) — FDA-approved for canine atopic dermatitis, NADA 141-218 (verified on the DailyMed label). LABEL LIMITS, verbatim: 'ATOPICA is contraindicated for use in dogs with a history of neoplasia. Do not use in dogs with a hypersensitivity to cyclosporine'; 'ATOPICA (cyclosporine) is a systemic immunosuppressant that may increase the susceptibility to infection and the development of neoplasia'; 'The safety and effectiveness of ATOPICA has not been established in dogs less than 6 months of age or less than 4 lbs body weight'; 'Killed vaccines are recommended for dogs receiving ATOPICA because the impact of cyclosporine on the immune response to modified live vaccines is unknown.' Label adverse reactions include vomiting 30.9%, diarrhoea 20.0%, persistent otitis externa 6.8%, gingival hyperplasia 2.3% ('Gingival hyperplasia regressed with dose tapering') and lymphadenopathy 2.3%; owner handling, verbatim: 'Capsules should not be broken or opened. Wear gloves during administration.' Oclacitinib maleate (oral) — label limits as listed in the flare step above. Recombinant interferons are EU-market products and are not US-licensed for this use. REGULATORY DISCIPLINE: implying FDA approval for a USDA-licensed biologic, or the reverse, is a genuine compliance error — Cytopoint is USDA APHIS-licensed, Apoquel and Atopica are FDA-approved, and none of them is 'approved' unqualified.

    ICADA 2015 guideline. The systematic review of 49 RCTs / 2,126 dogs found evidence of efficacy for oral ciclosporin (6 RCTs) and subcutaneous recombinant gamma-interferon (1 RCT) (PMID 20187910). For lokivetmab the pivotal-class trial randomised 274 client-owned dogs with chronic AD across 40 European practices to monthly lokivetmab or daily oral ciclosporin: lokivetmab was NON-INFERIOR to ciclosporin for pruritus reduction at day 28 (51.90% vs 43.72%), onset was within one day, and in the 81-dog continuation phase 76.3% of assessed dogs were rated 'normal' for pruritus at study end. Honest caveat that must travel with this citation: non-inferiority for the CADESI-03 lesion endpoint was NOT achieved (54.17% vs 56.86%), and at no time point were mean CADESI-03 scores significantly different between groups. Moyaert et al., Vet Dermatol 2017;28:593–e145, PMID 28906040, DOI 10.1111/vde.12478 — manufacturer-authored. Real-world limits: in 135 referral dogs on lokivetmab, adverse effects (lethargy, vomiting, hyperexcitability, injection-site pain, urinary incontinence) were reported in 11 of 132 dogs, and dogs that had not responded to oclacitinib were LESS likely to respond to lokivetmab (Souza et al., Vet Dermatol 2018;29:489-e164, PMID 30141223, DOI 10.1111/vde.12682).

    Moyaert H et al. Vet Dermatol 2017;28(6):593-e145. PMID 28906040. DOI 10.1111/vde.12478; Souza CP et al. Vet Dermatol 2018;29(6):489-e164. PMID 30141223. DOI 10.1111/vde.12682

  4. Offer allergen-specific immunotherapy — the only disease-modifying option

    Aprobado / respaldado por guías

    ICADA states that allergen-specific immunotherapy and proactive intermittent topical glucocorticoid application are the ONLY interventions likely to prevent or delay the recurrence of flares. Everything else on this page controls signs. ASIT requires a confirmed clinical diagnosis of cAD first, then allergy testing to select the allergens, then months of subcutaneous or sublingual dosing before a verdict. It is an injection of the very allergens the dog reacts to, so the induction doses belong where the dog can be watched afterwards, and an owner who gives maintenance injections at home must have the emergency signs, a plan, and a phone number — and must never adjust the volume or the interval without calling first.

    Productos nombrados: Allergen extracts are compounded per patient from the test-identified allergens; there is no single named approved product to cite. Route is subcutaneous or sublingual. LIMITS: months before a verdict, no benefit from testing without a clinical diagnosis first, uncommon and usually mild adverse effects under supervision, and an acute allergic reaction is the one that must be recognised — observe the dog after induction doses, and call before any dose or interval is changed at home.

    ICADA 2015 consensus statement, verbatim on the prevention point. Supported independently by the Cochrane-method systematic review, which found evidence of efficacy for subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy in 3 randomised controlled trials within a body of 49 RCTs / 2,126 dogs (Olivry et al., Vet Dermatol 2010;21:4–22, PMID 20187910). Allergen selection methodology is specified in the ICADA diagnostic guidelines (Hensel et al. 2015, PMID 26260508). SAFETY, stated rather than assumed: in a retrospective series of 230 client-owned dogs given supervised rush immunotherapy, adverse effects occurred in 6 of 230 (2.6%) — five with mild gastrointestinal signs and one with a 1.5 °C temperature rise — and all were graded mild and self-limiting (Weitzer T, Mueller R, Vet Dermatol 2023;34(5):385-392, PMID 37157908, DOI 10.1111/vde.13170). In 82 dogs on venom immunotherapy, 26 had at least one adverse event, the per-injection reaction rate was 2.8%, gastrointestinal upset was the most common event, and 'No deaths or severe anaphylactic reactions were reported' (Ewing TS et al., Vet Dermatol 2021;33(1):40-e14, PMID 34414617, DOI 10.1111/vde.13016). So the defensible statement is that reactions are uncommon and usually mild under supervision — not that they cannot happen, and not that anaphylaxis is documented at any measurable rate in these canine series.

    Olivry T et al. BMC Vet Res 2015;11:210. PMID 26276051. DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0514-6; Weitzer T, Mueller R. Vet Dermatol 2023;34(5):385-392. PMID 37157908. DOI 10.1111/vde.13170

  5. Add proactive intermittent topical glucocorticoid to previously affected sites

    Aprobado / respaldado por guías

    Rather than waiting for the next flare, the guideline supports applying topical glucocorticoid intermittently to the sites that flare, as a flare-prevention strategy. It is the second of only two interventions ICADA credits with preventing or delaying recurrence, and it is cheap. Because this step deliberately makes a steroid a LONG-TERM habit, it has to be prescribed with its own ceiling: named sites, a named frequency, a named review date, and a veterinary skin check at that review. Chronic topical glucocorticoid use thins skin, and the changes to look for at review are thinning or transparency of the treated skin, new comedones ('blackheads'), visible surface blood vessels, easy bruising, poor wound healing, delayed hair regrowth, and firm gritty plaques suggesting calcinosis cutis. Topical steroid is also absorbed: a large treated area, an occluded fold, or a dog that licks the site can produce systemic steroid effects including increased thirst and urination. Owners should never extend the treated area, increase the frequency, or start a human hydrocortisone or combination cream on their own — call first.

    Productos nombrados: Hydrocortisone aceponate spray and other veterinary topical glucocorticoids; topical triamcinolone. LIMITS: defined sites, defined frequency, a scheduled skin review; watch for skin thinning, comedones, visible vessels, bruising, poor healing and firm gritty plaques; expect some systemic absorption over large or occluded areas; keep the dog from licking treated skin. Human hydrocortisone and human combination steroid creams are not a substitute and must not be started by an owner.

    ICADA 2015 consensus statement, stated explicitly alongside ASIT as the only two flare-prevention interventions. Topical glucocorticoid efficacy for active disease is separately supported by a topical triamcinolone RCT within the 49-RCT systematic review (PMID 20187910). HONESTY NOTE ON THE HARM LIST: the cutaneous-atrophy, comedone and calcinosis-cutis effects of prolonged topical glucocorticoid use are the standard veterinary dermatology caution and are the reason the guideline says intermittent rather than continuous, but a primary citation quantifying them in dogs on a proactive intermittent protocol was NOT captured in this research pass. They are therefore written here as what to monitor and discuss with the prescribing veterinarian, not as a cited incidence.

    Olivry T et al. BMC Vet Res 2015;11:210. PMID 26276051. DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0514-6

  6. Build the skin-barrier and hygiene layer: bathing frequency and essential fatty acids

    Ensayo controlado en esta especie

    ICADA's chronic-disease algorithm asks for adequate skin and coat hygiene, which might include more frequent bathing and possibly increasing essential fatty acid intake. This is adjunctive and slow, and its best-documented value is drug-sparing rather than standalone itch control.

    Productos nombrados: Omega-3 / essential fatty acid supplements and EFA-enriched diets; mild non-irritant shampoos. No FDA-approved drug claim attaches to these. LIMITS: high-dose fish oil can cause loose stool and, at high intakes, affects platelet function, so it is a dose to agree with the veterinarian rather than to escalate at home — and an oil-flavoured supplement will break an elimination diet trial. Human medicated shampoos, dips and 'anti-itch' products are not interchangeable with veterinary ones.

    The systematic review of 49 RCTs reports that one HIGH-QUALITY randomised controlled trial showed an oral essential fatty acid supplement could reduce prednisolone consumption by approximately half (Olivry et al., Vet Dermatol 2010;21:4–22, PMID 20187910, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00784.x). A 23-study systematic review found omega-3 benefit across indications including allergic dermatitis and haircoat (Magalhães et al., In Vivo 2021, PMID 33910819, DOI 10.21873/invivo.12394). Do not present fatty acids as a substitute for the agents in the steps above.

    Olivry T et al. Vet Dermatol 2010;21:4–22. PMID 20187910. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00784.x

  7. Measure response, and monitor the drug as well as the disease, on a schedule

    Aprobado / respaldado por guías

    cAD is a relapsing-remitting disease with strong seasonal and placebo components, so before-and-after impressions are unreliable. Score owner-reported itch and veterinarian-observed lesions at every decision point, and re-check at dose changes and at seasonal onset. A dog on long-term immunomodulation needs its own monitoring loop alongside the itch score: recheck examination looking specifically for new infection, demodicosis, a new lump, and in glucocorticoid patients for polyuria/polydipsia and urinary tract infection; and repeat the baseline bloodwork rather than treating it as a one-off. The Apoquel label directs that dogs receiving it 'should be monitored for the development of infections, including demodicosis, and neoplasia', and the Atopica label warns of increased susceptibility to infection and development of neoplasia — those are monitoring instructions, not background text. Set the interval with the prescribing veterinarian, write it in the record, and hold to it even while the dog looks well.

    Productos nombrados: Not applicable — this step is measurement and drug monitoring, not medication. It exists so that the label monitoring requirements for oclacitinib and ciclosporin actually get performed.

    The owner-scored pruritus Visual Analog Scale was validated in 713 owners, establishing a normal range of 0–1.9 and a median post-treatment reduction of 4.4 points; notably only 12% of owners would have been satisfied with the 50% reduction typically quoted as success in antipruritic drug trials (Rybnícek et al., Vet Dermatol 2009;20:115–22, PMID 19171021, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2008.00728.x). CADESI-4 is the ICADA-recommended lesion scale, scoring erythema, lichenification and alopecia/excoriation 0–3 at 20 body sites, with severity benchmarks of 10 (mild), 35 (moderate) and 60 (severe) (Olivry et al., Vet Dermatol 2014;25:77–85, PMID 24461108, DOI 10.1111/vde.12107). The drug-monitoring instructions are label text from DailyMed for Apoquel (NADA 141-345) and Atopica (NADA 141-218); the 630-day oclacitinib study re-assessed at approximately 90-day intervals and found haematology and serum chemistry means within reference ranges over that period (Cosgrove et al. 2015, PMID 25688708). No specific numeric recheck interval for canine AD immunomodulation is set by the ICADA guideline, so the interval is a prescriber decision and is not asserted here as a guideline requirement.

    Rybnícek J et al. Vet Dermatol 2009;20(2):115–22. PMID 19171021. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2008.00728.x; Olivry T et al. Vet Dermatol 2014;25(2):77–85. PMID 24461108. DOI 10.1111/vde.12107

Guía profesional

ICADA 2015 updated guidelines for the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis (International Committee on Allergic Diseases of Animals) — International Committee on Allergic Diseases of Animals (ICADA)

Olivry T, DeBoer DJ, Favrot C, Jackson HA, Mueller RS, Nuttall T, Prélaud P. Treatment of canine atopic dermatitis: 2015 updated guidelines from the International Committee on Allergic Diseases of Animals (ICADA). BMC Vet Res 2015;11:210. PMID 26276051. DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0514-6

Cómo se diagnostica

  • Establish the clinical diagnosis by pattern, not by a test. ICADA's diagnostic guidelines are explicit: cAD is diagnosed by meeting clinical criteria and ruling out other causes with similar signs (Hensel et al., BMC Vet Res 2015;11:196, PMID 26260508, DOI 10.1186/s12917-015-0515-5).
  • Rule out ectoparasites. Flea combing and deep skin scrapings for Demodex and Sarcoptes are specified in the guideline work-up; add a therapeutic acaricidal trial where scabies remains plausible, since scrapings are insensitive (Hensel 2015, PMID 26260508).
  • Cytology of skin and ear canal for staphylococcal and Malassezia overgrowth, and treat what you find before judging any antipruritic. Uncontrolled secondary infection is the most common reason an atopic dog 'fails' a drug (Hensel 2015, PMID 26260508).
  • Culture and susceptibility, not another empirical course, when pyoderma recurs or fails. Repeated long empirical systemic antibiotic courses without cytology and, on recurrence or failure, culture, are how methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is selected for in this exact patient population. Topical antisepsis carries much of this work and should be used before and alongside systemic drugs, not after them.
  • Run an elimination diet trial in any dog with perennial pruritus and/or concurrent gastrointestinal signs. The guideline states this is required, not optional, in that subgroup (Hensel 2015, PMID 26260508). Tell the owner in plain words what the trial is: a single prescribed diet, commonly for about eight weeks, with nothing else entering the dog — no treats, no table food, no dental chews, no flavored medicines or flavored preventives — followed by re-challenge. Cutaneous adverse food reaction is a separate diagnosis that looks nearly identical to environmental atopic dermatitis, and a trial that is 95% strict is a trial that produces no answer.
  • Only after cAD is clinically diagnosed, perform allergy testing — intradermal testing or allergen-specific serum IgE — to identify candidate allergens for allergen-specific immunotherapy. It is an allergen-selection tool, not a diagnostic test (Hensel 2015, PMID 26260508). Interpret serology conservatively: 75.6% of 25,451 dogs with merely suspected cAD were IgE-positive to at least one allergen (Drouet et al. 2024, PMID 39469743).
  • Record a baseline owner-scored pruritus VAS and a baseline veterinarian-scored CADESI-4 before starting therapy, so response is measured rather than remembered (Rybnícek et al. 2009, PMID 19171021; Olivry et al. 2014, PMID 24461108).
  • Obtain baseline CBC and serum chemistry, and urinalysis where a glucocorticoid or another immunomodulator is planned, before starting long-term immunomodulation — then repeat them on a schedule rather than once. Document flea/tick preventive coverage and bathing frequency, both of which are guideline-level flare factors (Olivry et al. 2015, PMID 26276051). Record which other animals live in the household and which species they are, because the flea-control plan you write for the dog can kill a cat.

Dónde encaja un biológico

No es un uso apropiadoNo es un uso apropiado

Nuestro propio producto, calificado con la misma regla

Ningún producto celular, de exosomas o de péptidos está aprobado para la dermatitis atópica canina por la FDA de Estados Unidos, el USDA APHIS ni la EMA de la Unión Europea, y la FDA declara que comercializar un producto animal no aprobado a base de células o tejidos es ilegal. Por eso ninguno de ellos se ofrece aquí como tratamiento para esta enfermedad. La evidencia en perros es contradictoria, no preliminar: el único estudio doble ciego y controlado con placebo de células madre no alcanzó su objetivo de gravedad de las lesiones evaluada por el veterinario con la escala CADESI-4, el primer estudio en perros fue negativo, los otros dos estudios con células madre no tuvieron grupo control en una enfermedad que va y viene por sí sola, y toda la evidencia canina con exosomas se reduce a un estudio piloto de seis beagles con dos perros por grupo, que no puede detectar una tasa de efectos adversos por debajo de aproximadamente el 10–15%. Primero van el control de los factores desencadenantes, un antipruriginoso respaldado por las guías con sus límites de ficha técnica respetados, y la inmunoterapia específica con alérgenos; ningún producto regenerativo sustituye a ninguno de ellos.

Qué existe

Esta sección aún no está disponible en español.

READ THIS FIRST, BECAUSE IT GOVERNS EVERYTHING BELOW. Nothing in this section is an offer, a recommendation, or a claim of efficacy. No cell, extracellular-vesicle or peptide product is approved for canine atopic dermatitis by the US FDA, USDA APHIS or the EU's EMA, and the US FDA states on its own website that 'Currently, no ACTPs are FDA-approved' and that 'It is illegal to market an unapproved ACTP because it hasn't gone through the required FDA pre-market review and approval process' (FDA, 'FDA's Role in Veterinary Regenerative Medicine', https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/cell-and-tissue-products-animals/fdas-role-veterinary-regenerative-medicine, both sentences verified verbatim on 12 September 2026; governing guidance CVM GFI #218, Cell-Based Products for Animal Use, June 2015 — note that GFI #218 itself uses the abbreviation ASCP, while the FDA web page quoted here uses ACTP). The published studies are summarised below because owners are being sold these products and deserve to see the actual record, not because the record supports buying one. MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS — DOG data, four clinical studies, and they disagree with each other. (1) The only double-blinded placebo-controlled trial: Kaur et al., Vet Res Commun 2021;46(1):251–260, PMID 34713306, DOI 10.1007/s11259-021-09853-9. Three arms — PBS placebo, low-dose and high-dose ALLOGENEIC canine adipose-derived MSC — three subcutaneous treatments at four-week intervals across five injection sites, patients kept off immune-modulating drugs. Result: owner-scored pruritus VAS and serum miR-483 were significantly lower in the HIGH-DOSE group versus placebo at day 90; veterinarian-scored CADESI-4 'also showed downward trends', i.e. it did NOT reach significance — the objective endpoint was missed. No severe adverse effects were observed. Critical limitations: the abstract publishes neither n per arm nor total n, no numeric PVAS effect size is given, the authors' own efficacy statement is bounded to 'until 30 days after the last subcutaneous administration', and the author list includes two commercial cell-therapy companies (PrimeGen US, RejuvenateBio). (2) The earliest attempt was NULL: Hall et al., Vet Ther 2010;11(2):E1-14, PMID 20957613 — prospective pilot, AUTOLOGOUS adipose MSC IV at 1.3 million cells/kg; the authors state verbatim that it 'did not significantly reduce the clinical signs of canine atopic dermatitis or the owner-assessed pruritus level.' (3) Uncontrolled open-label, n=26 enrolled / 22 completed: Villatoro et al., Vet Rec 2018;183(21):654, PMID 30158120, DOI 10.1136/vr.104867 — single IV dose of 1.5x10^6 allogeneic canine adipose MSC/kg in dogs refractory to conventional therapy; pruritus VAS and CADESI-04 both fell and stayed down to six months, no adverse events. No control arm, in a relapsing-remitting disease with a strong placebo component — so this series cannot separate treatment from natural fluctuation. (4) Uncontrolled open-label, n=16: de Oliveira Ramos et al., J Adv Vet Anim Res 2020, DOI 10.5455/javar.2020.g453 — IV MSC at 21-day intervals over 82 days; reduced epidermal thickness on histopathology in the moderate and severe groups only, which is a surrogate endpoint, not a clinical one. EXOSOMES / EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES — the entire dog record is one pilot with two dogs per arm. Kim et al., Animals 2024;14(2):282, PMID 38254451, DOI 10.3390/ani14020282: SIX LABORATORY BEAGLES with cAD assigned to saline, canine exosomes or human (xenogeneic) exosomes, 1.5 mL IV three times per week for four weeks. Skin lesion score and transepidermal water loss were lower than control; IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-4, IL-12, IL-13 and IL-31 fell while IL-10 and TGF-beta rose; skin bacterial dysbiosis was alleviated. The authors' own conclusion is conditional — that these treatments 'may alleviate CAD in dogs'. At n=2 per arm this is hypothesis-generating only, it cannot support any efficacy statement, and it cannot detect an adverse event rate below roughly 10–15%. Everything else in the 'canine AD exosome' literature is a MOUSE model using canine-derived product (Cho et al., Animals 2023;13:2215, DOI 10.3390/ani13132215 — Biostir-induced mouse; Kim et al., Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:4868, DOI 10.3390/ijms23094868 — DNCB mouse) or in-vitro work. REGULATORY POSITION ON THE ONE AUTHORISED CANINE MSC MEDICINE: DogStem (EMEA/V/C/005829) is an EQUINE umbilical-cord MSC product authorised by the EMA for use in DOGS — and it is authorised for OSTEOARTHRITIS, not for skin disease. It is not FDA-approved. IMMUNOLOGY — cell products are not immune-invisible, and the boundary on this evidence matters. In a randomised target-animal safety trial, 24 young HEALTHY police working dogs received INTRA-ARTICULAR injection into the stifle on day 0 and day 28; 6/8 (75%) of dogs given xenogeneic equine umbilical-cord MSC and 5/8 (63%) of dogs given allogeneic canine adipose MSC developed antibodies against the cells they received, 1/8 placebo dogs also showed a humoral response, and the sponsor's own authors conclude MSCs are 'immune-tolerant rather than immune-privileged' (Punzón et al., Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1098029, PMID 37266387, DOI 10.3389/fvets.2023.1098029). Two boundaries on carrying that number onto this page. First, route and population: that was intra-articular dosing in healthy young dogs, whereas the routes in the skin studies above are intravenous and subcutaneous in diseased atopic dogs — a different exposure, a different antigen load and a different immune context, and transferability is unknown. Second, the titre question: the paper's abstract says antibody titres were generated, while its full text states that 'the specific antibody titers were not investigated in the present study, which has prevented a potential comparison between the titration between xenogenic and allogenic' — so titres were detected as present but were not measured or compared, and no titre magnitude may be quoted. Clinical safety in that trial was nonetheless acceptable, with no product-related adverse events after single or repeated administration and no detectable CD8+ cytotoxic memory response.

Qué no se ha demostrado

Esta sección aún no está disponible en español.

There is NO cell, exosome or peptide product approved or licensed for canine atopic dermatitis by FDA, USDA APHIS or EMA, and under US law an unapproved animal cell- or tissue-based product may not lawfully be marketed for this indication at all — so no owner should be charged for one as a treatment for this disease, and a Colombian entity does not change US marketing law for US-directed promotion. No MSC study in dogs with cAD has demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in veterinarian-scored lesion severity (CADESI-4) versus placebo — the one blinded placebo-controlled trial missed that endpoint. No MSC or exosome study in dogs with cAD has demonstrated steroid-sparing, reduced flare frequency, disease modification, cure, or any benefit beyond 30 days after the last dose in a controlled design. No adequately powered exosome trial in dogs with naturally occurring atopic dermatitis exists — the only canine EV study is six laboratory beagles, two per arm — and there is no target-animal safety database for repeated intravenous exosome administration in dogs, which means the infusion-reaction and immune-reaction risk of these products in atopic dogs is unquantified rather than low. No head-to-head trial compares any MSC or exosome preparation against oclacitinib, lokivetmab, ciclosporin, glucocorticoids or allergen-specific immunotherapy. No published controlled clinical trial in dogs, cats or horses supports ANY peptide in the MicroAmino catalogue for skin disease: BPC-157's only canine data is a beagle pharmacokinetics study (PMID 36588717) with no efficacy data; TB-500 / thymosin beta-4 has no companion-animal efficacy evidence and is FEI-banned; GHK-Cu, KPV, LL-37 and thymosin alpha-1 have no controlled trial in any veterinary species — LL-37 is specifically the HUMAN cathelicidin, and dogs express their own (K9CATH), so administering it is xenogeneic by design. And mouse atopic-dermatitis model data generated with canine-derived cells or vesicles is rodent evidence, not canine evidence, no matter what the paper title says.

Fuentes

  1. The only blinded placebo-controlled MSC trial in canine AD — positive on owner-scored itch, MISSED the veterinarian-scored lesion endpoint — Kaur G, Ramirez A, Xie C, Clark D, Dong C, Maki C, Ramos T, Izadyar F, Najera SOL, Harb J, Hao J. A double-blinded placebo-controlled evaluation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of canine atopic dermatitis. Vet Res Commun 2021;46(1):251-260. PMID 34713306. Authors include PrimeGen US and RejuvenateBio. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09853-9
  2. The null canine MSC pilot that vendor literature omits — Hall MN, Rosenkrantz WS, Hong JH, Griffin CE, Mendelsohn CM. Evaluation of the potential use of adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis: a pilot study. Vet Ther 2010;11(2):E1-14. PMID 20957613. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20957613/
  3. Uncontrolled open-label MSC series in refractory canine AD (n=26 enrolled, 22 completed) — no control arm — Villatoro AJ, Hermida-Prieto M, Fernández V, Fariñas F, Alcoholado C, Rodríguez-García MI, Mariñas-Pardo L, Becerra J. Allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy in dogs with refractory atopic dermatitis: clinical efficacy and safety. Vet Rec 2018;183(21):654. PMID 30158120. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.104867
  4. The entire canine exosome evidence base for this disease: six laboratory beagles, two per arm — Kim SW, Lim KM, Cho SG, Ryu B, Kim CY, Park SY, Jang K, Jung JH, Park C, Choi C, Kim JH. Efficacy of allogeneic and xenogeneic exosomes for the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis: a pilot study. Animals (Basel) 2024;14(2):282. PMID 38254451. The authors' own conclusion is that these treatments 'may alleviate CAD in dogs'. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14020282
  5. Why 'immune-privileged' is not a defensible claim — the sponsor's own target-animal safety trial, INTRA-ARTICULAR route in healthy dogs — Punzón E, García-Castillo M, Rico MA, Padilla L, Pradera A. Local, systemic and immunologic safety comparison between xenogeneic equine umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells, allogeneic canine adipose mesenchymal stem cells and placebo: a randomized controlled trial. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1098029. PMID 37266387. 24 young healthy police working dogs, intra-articular dosing into the stifle; specific antibody titres were not investigated. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1098029
  6. FDA: no animal cell- and tissue-based product is approved, and marketing an unapproved one is illegal — US Food and Drug Administration. FDA's Role in Veterinary Regenerative Medicine. Both quoted sentences verified verbatim on the live page, 12 September 2026. Governing guidance: CVM GFI #218, Cell-Based Products for Animal Use, June 2015. https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/cell-and-tissue-products-a
  7. Mouse AD model with canine-derived vesicles — the species trap in the title — Cho BS, Kim SB, Kim S, Rhee B, Yoon J, Lee JW. Canine mesenchymal-stem-cell-derived extracellular vesicles attenuate atopic dermatitis. Animals (Basel) 2023;13(13):2215. PMID 37444013. MOUSE model, not a dog trial. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13132215

Seguimiento de la respuesta

Cómo saber si está funcionando

Owner-scored Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (PVAS) as the primary patient-reported outcome, paired with the veterinarian-scored Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index version 4 (CADESI-4) as the clinician-observed lesion measure. These are the two instruments used as endpoints in the canine AD literature, including the MSC trial discussed on this page, so they are also the only instruments that let a clinic compare its own outcomes to published ones. Alongside them, a dog on long-term immunomodulation needs a drug-monitoring loop: a physical examination looking for new infection, demodicosis and new masses, repeat CBC and serum chemistry, and urinalysis in glucocorticoid patients.

PVAS: Rybnícek J, Lau-Gillard PJ, Harvey R, Hill PB. Further validation of a pruritus severity scale for use in dogs. Vet Dermatol 2009;20(2):115-22. PMID 19171021. DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2008.00728.x — validated in 713 owners; a visual analogue line without printed numbers is essential, because owners anchor to visible numerals and the scale loses its continuous behaviour; normal range 0–1.9; median post-treatment reduction 4.4 points; only 12% of owners would have been satisfied with the 50% reduction conventionally reported as treatment success. CADESI-4: Olivry T, Saridomichelakis M, Nuttall T, Bensignor E, Griffin CE, Hill PB. Validation of the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI)-4. Vet Dermatol 2014;25(2):77-85. PMID 24461108. DOI 10.1111/vde.12107 — 20 body sites, erythema/lichenification/alopecia-excoriation each graded 0–3, satisfactory validity, reliability and sensitivity to change, administered in about one-third the time of CADESI-3; severity benchmarks 10 (mild), 35 (moderate), 60 (severe); ICADA recommends CADESI-4 over CADESI-3 for clinical trials. Drug monitoring: the Apoquel label (FDA, NADA 141-345) directs that 'Dogs receiving APOQUEL should be monitored for the development of infections, including demodicosis, and neoplasia'; the Atopica label (FDA, NADA 141-218) warns that ciclosporin 'may increase the susceptibility to infection and the development of neoplasia' and that 'exacerbation of sub-clinical neoplastic and infectious conditions may occur'.

Frecuencia sugerida: Baseline PVAS and CADESI-4, plus baseline CBC, serum chemistry and — where a glucocorticoid is planned — urinalysis, before any new therapy. For an acute flare or a newly started drug: re-score at day 14 and day 28 (day 28 is the primary endpoint timepoint in the lokivetmab pivotal trial). For stable chronic disease: re-score every 90 days, the interval used in the 630-day oclacitinib long-term study, and additionally at every dose change, at the start of the dog's known flare season, and whenever the owner reports a change. At each of those chronic rechecks, the examination must specifically look for new infection, demodicosis and new masses, because both first-line long-term drugs are labelled as raising those risks, and repeat bloodwork rather than relying on the baseline — the exact laboratory interval is a prescriber decision, not a guideline requirement, and should be written into the record and held to even while the dog looks well. Any owner-reported change in thirst, urination, appetite, a new lump, vomiting, diarrhoea or new hair loss brings the recheck forward. The MSC trial's day-90 endpoint and its explicit 'until 30 days after the last administration' boundary are the reason any regenerative protocol would have to be re-scored at 30 and 90 days rather than declared a success at week 2.

Preguntas que puede responder en casa

  • On a line from 'no itching at all' at one end to 'the worst itching you can imagine' at the other, mark where your dog is today.
  • In the past week, how many nights did scratching, licking or chewing wake your dog up — or wake you up?
  • Which places are being licked or chewed right now: paws, belly, armpits, groin, ears, face, base of the tail?
  • How are the ears this week — any head shaking, ear scratching, smell, or discharge? Any head tilt, wobbliness, or a change in how the face moves?
  • Has anything new appeared since the last check-in: open sores, bleeding, thickened or darkened skin, new bald patches, scabs or pimples, or a new lump?
  • Any change in how much your dog is drinking or urinating, in appetite, or any vomiting or diarrhoea since we started this medicine?
  • Did you miss any flea or tick doses, any baths, or any medication doses in the last month — and did you change a dose, add anything, or give any human medicine, supplement or cream? (An honest answer here changes the plan more often than any test.)
  • Which other animals live in the house, and what species are they? We need to know before we choose a flea product.

Última revisión: 2026-09-12 · Cada afirmación de esta página lleva una fuente que usted puede verificar. Si alguna no se sostiene, díganoslo y la corregiremos. science@azzamedical.com

Cree un perfil para su mascota

Cuéntenos qué está enfrentando y el sitio le mostrará solo lo que aplica.